Insights into creating a successful Disaster Recovery Test – Part 2: Preparation

Insights into creating a successful Disaster Recovery Test

Part 2 – DR Test Preparations

DR Tests are the only way to measure the effectiveness of a Disaster Recovery Program. Once the objectives of a DR Test are set, the preparation activities can begin. Test preparations include reviewing DR Plans for correctness, collaborating with the various stakeholders, identifying test metrics, and managing logistics.

Plan Preparation:

DR plans are optimally segmented into three groups based on each plan’s scope and the stakeholders involved:

  • IT Infrastructure Systems Recovery Plans: owned by IT Infrastructure Teams
  • Application Validation Plans: owned by Business Analysts
  • End-User Acceptance Test Plans: Business user test procedures prior to end-user hand-over

Owner Teams review the content of the DR Plans to check for completeness and accuracy while also verifying that relevant reference documents are attached. Each DR Plan is checked to ensure that all tasks are assigned a planned completion duration, are properly sequenced to be completed in relation to other tasks, and assigned to recovery teams with the requisite skills.

Once checked, overall estimated recovery time can be determined based on the Critical Path of all plan tasks that are within scope of the test.

Single image

DR Tests Metrics:

Based on DR Test objectives, senior management can define the test metrics to be reported on. The primary objective of a DR Test is usually to report on Achievable vs. Planned Recovery Time for all Tier-1/Tier-2 IT applications.

Additionally, for effective management of the recovery process, the Incident Commanders need

real-time status of each application being restored, the DR Plan being executed, as well as staff resource scheduling and availability.

Logistics:

Understanding the various stakeholders involved, their role, and their informational requirements will enhance the overall collaboration and efficiency of the recovery process. This includes creating the Incident Command, Recovery and Administration team participant list after determining the skills required for the test. Once the team participant list is created, a schedule can be set detailing which shifts, roles and skills each member is involved in.

In cases where travel and lodging are required accommodations can be made in time for the exercise.

Conclusion:

As a BCP/DR software solution provider, we are regularly called on to assist our enterprise customers to prepare, manage and enhance their DR Test Exercises. As discussed in Part 1 of this blog, one of our power distribution customers had determined that this year’s exercise scope would include fifty-seven Tier 1 and 2 service applications.  With more than three million consumer households at stake, disaster preparedness is designated a mission critical program for this organization. Periodic testing and validation of their documented Disaster Recovery Plans is the only way to certify their DR Program as credible and viable.

Next Steps:

Part 1 of this blog series detailed the setting of DR Test scope and objectives.  Test Preparation is covered here in Part 2.  Coming soon, Actual Test Execution is discussed in Part 3, and After Test Review is covered Part.

SHARE:
eBRP Insights

eBRP Insights

The eBRP Insights blog voice represents more than 50 years of BCM experience with corporate BCM program management and implementations. We've worked hand-in-hand with many government and private enterprises to assist them in developing viable BCM programs. eBRP is an active participant on LinkedIn and Twitter. The opinions expressed in our this blog are ours and are intended to engage resiliency planners in conversations about the BCM industry including it's standards and future.

Related Posts

Insights into creating a successful Disaster Recovery Test – Part 3: Metrics

Insights into creating a successful...

Insights into creating a successful Disaster Recovery exercise – Part 1: Objectives

Insights into creating a successful...

Aligning Cyber Incident Response Planning with Your BC/DR Program

Aligning Cyber Incident Response Pl...

Cyber disruptions – and their impact on both reputations and…
What Can You Do when your BCM software Relationship Falls Apart

What Can You Do when your BCM softw...

“This isn’t working.”  “I’ve changed.”  “I don’t see a future…
Aligning BC/DR to CSIRP Challenges

Aligning BC/DR to CSIRP Challenges

The immediate reaction to a cyber-security incident is the FUD…
Technology Modeling – the eBRP Way

Technology Modeling - the eBRP Way

Definition: Technology modeling is a point-in-time snapshot of an Enterprise’s…
eBIA – The eBRP Way

eBIA - The eBRP Way

Definition: A Business Impact Analysis (BIA) is the cornerstone of…
Threats, Impacts, BCPs

Threats, Impacts, BCPs

Within Business Continuity circles there is ongoing debate about the…
The BCM Challenge: Executive Buy-In

The BCM Challenge: Executive Buy-In

As a Business Continuity Management (BCM) solution provider, the first…
DR Plans – The What, When & Who

DR Plans - The What, When & Who

As a Business Continuity practitioner with more than 20 years…