A Business Continuity Acronym that Makes Sense: AQAP

Recovery Time Objective.  Anyone who deals with Business Continuity or Disaster Recovery – as a planner, responder or auditor – is familiar with the term.  It appears in every Business Continuity Management (BCM) ‘Standard’.  It is the generally-accepted benchmark by which BCM programs measure both goals and achievement.

Recovery Time Objective (RTO) has be around since the early days of Disaster Recovery.

The BCM process (as exemplified by industry ‘standards’) relies on several organizational metrics as benchmarks for goals and achievements.  RTO is a useful parameter for planning – and for gauging the result of an exercise or test.  But in today’s connected world, news – especially bad news – travels at the speed of the Internet.

As a relative measure (comparing the criticality of one business operation against another) RTO is a useful measure.  So for planning purposes, RTO can help determine relative criticality; providing the ‘order of battle’ in which business processes (or IT services) must be restored.

But shouldn’t our understanding of the implications of internet propagation & amplification also influence our recovery goals?  Should some algorithmically-generated RTO serve as our only recovery goal?

We need to understand that RTO is a planning metric – not an incident response objective.  The reality in today’s wired world is that every Business Continuity recovery objective should be as sas possible.

In fact, it’s probably time to introduce another valuable acronym: AQAP (As Quickly as Possible).  It’s time to stop pretending that RTO has any meaning beyond its value as a relative planning metric.  Why not use “ASAP”?  Because its meaning has already been morphed by common usage; it often means “when I get around to it” or “if I ever find the time”).  Incident Response needs a clear and obvious objective.  That’s what makes the acronym AQAP perfect for the role.  There’s no mistaking As Quickly as Possible for ASAP.

Let 2017 be the year that Business Continuity Management stops treading the same old path and faces the fact that the Response to any business disruption – no matter how limited – requires recovery AQAP: As Quickly as Possible.  AQAP is the new paradigm for Incident Response.

SHARE:
Jim Mitchell

Jim Mitchell

A frequent speaker at Business Continuity conferences, many of Jim Mitchell’s blogs can be found elsewhere on eBRP’s website and has published articles in DRJ, Continuity Insights and Continuity Central. Jim has more than 20 years of experience in Business Continuity; if you don’t agree with his opinions – he won’t be surprised.

Related Posts

Enterprise Resiliency: Navigating Through Disruptions

Enterprise Resiliency: Navigating T...

In today’s threat landscape, the ability of an organization to…
Orchestrating BC/DR Testing: Virtual – Emergency Operations Centers

Orchestrating BC/DR Testing: Virtua...

  Enhancing Planning and Logistics Management  Coordinating BC/DR tests involves…
Insights into creating a successful Disaster Recovery Test – Part 2: Preparation

Insights into creating a successful...

Insights into creating a successful Disaster Recovery exercise – Part 1: Objectives

Insights into creating a successful...

Aligning Cyber Incident Response Planning with Your BC/DR Program

Aligning Cyber Incident Response Pl...

Cyber disruptions – and their impact on both reputations and…
What Can You Do when your BCM software Relationship Falls Apart

What Can You Do when your BCM softw...

“This isn’t working.”  “I’ve changed.”  “I don’t see a future…
Aligning BC/DR to CSIRP Challenges

Aligning BC/DR to CSIRP Challenges

The immediate reaction to a cyber-security incident is the FUD…
Technology Modeling – the eBRP Way

Technology Modeling - the eBRP Way

Definition: Technology modeling is a point-in-time snapshot of an Enterprise’s…
eBIA – The eBRP Way

eBIA - The eBRP Way

Definition: A Business Impact Analysis (BIA) is the cornerstone of…
Threats, Impacts, BCPs

Threats, Impacts, BCPs

Within Business Continuity circles there is ongoing debate about the…