Home / Business Continuity / A Paint Job Won’t Make Your Car Safer… (A New BIA Won’t Make You More Prepared)
Home / Business Continuity / A Paint Job Won’t Make Your Car Safer… (A New BIA Won’t Make You More Prepared)

A Paint Job Won’t Make Your Car Safer… (A New BIA Won’t Make You More Prepared)

A new finish for your old car may look great, but in the end, it may still be a ’71 Pinto.  The cost of the BIA process – writing, distributing, validating, analyzing, reporting, presenting to Management, revising and repeating annually – can be a staggering amount.  Yet a BIA may be no more valuable than that new paint job.

Business Continuity programs rely on BIA’s because ‘standards’ says they must.  BIA data gathering isn’t useless– just time-consuming, and questionably valuable.

  • There’s little proof that BIA’s improve planning, since there’s often little in a BIA to inform individual plan tasks.
  • If it doesn’t improve planning, it won’t improve organizational readiness either.
  • Most enterprise criticalities are already understood within the organization; there’s little point looking for them (again) in a BIA.
  • The man-hours spent on BIA development, completion and analysis is shockingly disproportionate to the value the results provide.

Here’s what you can do if you stop wasting time on BIA’s:

  • Rely on your C-Suite for direction about criticality of products and services. Those criticalities are part of organizational operating strategies.  Just ask the right people instead of asking everyone.
  • Use those most critical products or services as targets. Work backward to determine what business processes deliver them – and the upstream processes that support them.  Process Mapping doesn’t require a BIA survey; just an inquisitive BCM professional.
  • Stop quibbling about RTO, which are arbitrary metrics. Determine them for business processes which deliver critical products and services. Every other RTO is relative to those critical processes; If it doesn’t support a critical business process or application, it’s RTO is irrelevant.  In the larger view, BCM programs should have ‘AQAP’ Recovery targets: As Quickly as Possible.

Conclusion:

BIA’s can be wasteful – especially of time.  They fritter away valuable resources without significant added value.

  • Stop fine-tuning questions every cycle in search of new or more granular answers.
  • Allow your C-Suite to tell you what products/services are important – instead of your BIA.
  • Focus on the critical assets (processes, applications, etc.) needed to recover those critical products/services.
  • Look for dependencies instead of impacts. If you understand dependencies, you can plan for the absence.
  • Ask the experts to identify risks. Why do it yourself? If you’ve got a Risk Management Dept., ask them.

Spend the time you save on exercises & plan improvements.  Readiness is more valuable than any BIA ‘paint job’.

Share:

Share:

More Posts:

Request a demo.